Search

02 Oct 2025

Convicted murderer's legal action against Limerick Prison over family visits 'resolved'

The assault happened at Limerick Prison

The High Court was told the case had been resolved

A HIGH Court action brought by convicted murderer Charlotte Mulhall over her inability to have visits from close family after her transfer to Limerick Prison from Mountjoy woman's prison has been resolved.

Mr Justice Anthony Barr was informed by Mulhall's lawyers, this Tuesday, that it was no longer necessary to bring the action as she had received several visits with close family in recent months.

She had brought High Court judicial review proceedings against the Irish Prison Service, the Governor of Limerick Prison, the Minister for Justice & Equality, Ireland, and the Attorney General claiming that the transfer, in 2018, had adversely impacted visits from family members.

Lawyers representing Ms Mulhall had argued that due to the transfer close family, who are based in Dublin, were unable to visit her.

In her action, she had sought a mandatory order from the Court requiring the prison service to transfer her to Dublin so she could receive familial visits when necessary.

Represented by Conor Power SC, with Cian Kelly Bl, Ms Mulhall claimed that situation had amounted to a disproportionate interference with her family rights.

On Tuesday Mr Power said that since the matter was last before the court the situation has changed.

Commencing last October, his client had been facilitated with three visits, after being transferred to neutral venues by the prison authorities. The court also heard that another visit has been arranged for an undisclosed location sometime next month.

Mr Power said that the practical reality of the situation was that his client had got what she wanted out of the proceedings and that the action did not need to proceed.

Counsel submitted his client should be awarded the legal costs of her action. He argued that it was necessary to bring the proceedings for the visits to be arranged.

She had received such visits up until mid-2019 but had originally claimed that those were ended without any apparent formal notification to Ms Mulhall.

The visits did not resume until last October, well after the proceedings had been commenced, counsel said.

The application for costs was opposed by the State bodies.

Anne-Marie Lawlor SC, for the respondents, said Limerick Prison had made its facilities available for those wishing to visit the applicant and that the application for costs was based on several misconceptions.

Counsel said that it was not responsible for the inability of close family to visit her in Limerick, which she said was due to external factors beyond either of the party's control.

Ms Mulhall had been afforded the same rights as every other prison in Limerick Prison, and her rights which the prison authorities were keenly aware of, had not been breached.

The respondents did not accept that the bringing of the proceedings had resulted in the prison services making arrangements for Ms Mulhall to visit close family.

Counsel said that the issues raised by Ms Mulhall in the action were very significant for her clients, and they opposed the making of any mandatory order compelling the prison service to transfer Ms Mulhall back to Mountjoy women's prison to facilitate visits.

Counsel said the established case law in this area is that the courts should "not attempt to micromanage prisons."

Visits to prison had also been curtailed over the last two years due to the covid-19 pandemic, counsel added.

Following the conclusion of submissions in relation to the issue of costs Mr Justice Barr in adjourned proceedings, said that he would rule on the costs issue on Wednesday.

In her action launched two years ago Ms Mulhall claimed she was transferred to Limerick two days after she was seen by a prison officer sitting on another prison officer while performing a beauty treatment.

She had always disputed any allegation that anything inappropriate occurred or that she was in an allegedly compromising position with the female prison officer in question.

She also claimed she was never given the opportunity to address the prison authorities over what she claimed occurred.

She further claimed that the transfer prohibited close family from visiting her. 

Last year the High Court ruled that Mulhall was not entitled to leave to challenge the decision to transfer her to Limerick, as her action had been brought out of time.

However, the court said she was entitled to bring an action over her visiting arrangements.

Known as the 'scissors sisters' Charlotte, and her sister Linda Mulhall, were convicted in 2006 of the killing of their mother's boyfriend Farah Swaleh Noor, in March 2005.

The dismembered body of Noor, who had a history of being extremely violent towards women, was found dumped in the Royal Canal, near Croke Park, some days afterwards.

Following a high-profile trial at the Central Criminal Court Charlotte, who was aged 21 years at the time of the killing, was found guilty of murder.  

Linda was found guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to 15 years in prison. and has subsequently been released from custody. 

To continue reading this article,
please subscribe and support local journalism!


Subscribing will allow you access to all of our premium content and archived articles.

Subscribe

To continue reading this article for FREE,
please kindly register and/or log in.


Registration is absolutely 100% FREE and will help us personalise your experience on our sites. You can also sign up to our carefully curated newsletter(s) to keep up to date with your latest local news!

Register / Login

Buy the e-paper of the Donegal Democrat, Donegal People's Press, Donegal Post and Inish Times here for instant access to Donegal's premier news titles.

Keep up with the latest news from Donegal with our daily newsletter featuring the most important stories of the day delivered to your inbox every evening at 5pm.