Please allow ads as they help fund our trusted local news content.
Kindly add us to your ad blocker whitelist.
If you want further access to Ireland's best local journalism, consider contributing and/or subscribing to our free daily Newsletter .
Support our mission and join our community now.
Subscribe Today!
To continue reading this article, you can subscribe for as little as €0.50 per week which will also give you access to all of our premium content and archived articles!
Alternatively, you can pay €0.50 per article, capped at €1 per day.
Thank you for supporting Ireland's best local journalism!
Limerick man 'heavily involved in the GAA' alleges assault and false imprisonment on Croke Park pitch after All Ireland hurling final
In February, the High Court granted a default non-appearance judgment in favour of Frank Reidy, of Belville, Kilmeedy
Limerick and Galway met in the 2018 All-Ireland final I PICTURE: Sportsfile
Reporter:
Paul Neilan
24 Oct 2024 3:00 PM
Email:
news@limerickleader.ie
THE HIGH Court has set aside a ruling against a security company in the case of a Limerick man who says he is “heavily involved in the GAA” and alleges that he was assaulted and falsely imprisoned by security and stewards upon entering the pitch after the 2018 All Ireland Hurling final at Croke Park.
In February, the High Court granted a default non-appearance judgment in favour of Frank Reidy, of Belville, Kilmeedy, Co Limerick, in absence of one of the defendants in the case.
Mr Reidy has submitted to the High Court that after the August 19, 2018, final when Limerick beat Galway in Croke Park he entered the pitch and “being heavily involved in the GAA”, was asked by management to collect the jerseys and bibs from the pitch.
The plaintiff submitted that he informed a member of the security personnel and/or stewards of his function and was granted access to the pitch. Mr Reidy claims he saw the wife and the father of one of the players having difficulty getting access to the pitch and went to their assistance.
The plaintiff says he was “suddenly and unexpectedly set upon” by personnel and asserts that he was assaulted, had his arm twisted behind his back and was “forcefully” ejected from the pitch.
Mr Reidy brought an action against the GAA, who are listed in the case as ‘Tom Ryan’ - a nominee of Cummann Lúthcleas Gael (the GAA) - and Sablecross Limited T/A Frontline Securities.
In a sworn statement made by a director of Sablecross, Allan Gannon, it is asserted that Mr Reidy encountered its operations manager on the day and indicated that he was a member of the Limerick County Hurling Board, which would have permitted him access to the pitch.
However, it is claimed that “upon enquiries with the Limerick management team, the operations manager discovered this not to be true”.
It is submitted that “the plaintiff was asked to leave the pitch and return to his seat”. It is asserted by the company that the plaintiff became abusive and aggressive to the extent of causing injury to the operations manager and ultimately involving Garda intervention.
An operative then removed the plaintiff from the grounds and the gates closed to prevent the plaintiff’s re-entry, claims Sablecross.
The High Court had been told that the incident was captured on CCTV footage by the GAA.
Ms Justice Denise Brett said that it was “common case” that the main physical injury claimed by the plaintiff was an exacerbation of a pre-existing injury to his left shoulder.
Ms Justice Brett said that the first defendant, the GAA, has filed a full defence and proceedings have progressed “as normal” with the case awaiting a hearing date. However, Ms Justice Brett set aside a February ruling against the second defendant, Sablecross LTD, over a failure of appearance.
Ms Justice Brett said she was satisfied that there had been a miscommunication of correspondence involving insurance companies in the case and that the defendant believed that the insurer’s solicitor would be present in the court for any hearing.
The delays in the case ahead of the default judgment involved documents incorrectly sent to Sablecross’ old address - the company having moved premises in March 2020. The case's timeline, the judge said, contained a “series of errors” concerning correspondence.
“I am satisfied that… in the interests of justice the judgment that was obtained in default of appearance ought to be set aside, notwithstanding that the efforts on behalf of the plaintiff’s solicitors were at all times above reproach,” she said.
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
4
To continue reading this article, please subscribe and support local journalism!
Subscribing will allow you access to all of our premium content and archived articles.
Subscribe
To continue reading this article for FREE, please kindly register and/or log in.
Registration is absolutely 100% FREE and will help us personalise your experience on our sites. You can also sign up to our carefully curated newsletter(s) to keep up to date with your latest local news!
Subscribe or register today to discover more from DonegalLive.ie
Buy a paper
Buy the e-paper of the Donegal Democrat, Donegal People's Press, Donegal Post and Inish Times here for instant access to Donegal's premier news titles.
Keep up with the latest news from Donegal with our daily newsletter featuring the most important stories of the day delivered to your inbox every evening at 5pm.
